Hot topics

What could Samsung's bendy phone possibly do to cost so much?

galaxy x
© Samsung

The folding phone with a bendy display is a creature of mobile myth, the unicorn or cockatrice of smartphones. But rumors and sightings continue, and many hope that Samsung will soon realize its near decades long ambition to make it a reality. But what kind of price will this legend fit on the market? According to the latest rumors, a veritable king's ransom.

Samsung's foldable smartphone, tentatively called the Galaxy X, could hit the market this year. The Korean company is certainly serious about making it happen, and loves to tease the possibility that it's just around the corner. But how much is a bendy screen worth to you? 

A bendy phone to break the bank

A report from a Korean news outlets cite industry sources who claim the Galaxy X will launch in early 2019, with a priced at somewhere around 2 million South Korean won, which converts to an insane $1800. Yikes.

The Korean report states that Samsung’s list of subcontractors and parts providers will supply Samsung with the necessary hardware for assembling the device at some point in the last quarter of this year, with retail launch expected in the early part of 2019.

We don't know what exactly to expect from this Galaxy X device yet, though artists and enthusiasts love to make concept designs. So far the only common denominator that surface in the swirling rumors points to a 7.2″ OLED display.

samsung1
These concepts look interesting, but something you would actually buy? / © Mobile Geeks

For the $1800 price tag, we can expect this flexible phone to also be packing top of the range internals and camera equivalent to the next gen flagship Galaxy devices such as the Galaxy S10 or the Galaxy Note 9.  The current king of the Galaxy is the S9+, priced at just over $800 so...are we expected to pay a grand just so we can bend it?

To my mind, the only thing that could justify such a price would be a device that does much more than a smartphone. Perhaps a flexible tablet powerful enough to serve as my main computer. The foldable screen on its own isn't enough to justify the price as a cool way to play with it: that kind of children's toy can only amuse for so long.

Consumers are sick of paying through the nose for gimmicks

Incredibly expensive smartphones as high-end status symbols certainly exist. Huawei's Mate RS Porsche Design costs a mind-boggling 2095 euro, or $2595, for the model with 512 GB internal memory. Apart from the luxury design, the only special technological feature on it is the in-display fingerprint scanner. You can even buy an engraved Samsung Galaxy S9+ plated with platinum or 24K gold for £3700 (almost $5000).

But I don't think the tech enthusiasts looking forward to the foldable display are the same market as the moneyed jet-setters that would splurge for a Mate RS Porsche Design. A bendy phone will get the geeks excited, but it doesn't exactly scream money and status.

If anything, smartphone enthusiasts and ordinary users alike seem to be unconvinced by the new flagship phones that charge ever higher prices with only minimal advancement in features. We were recently impressed by a survey from China, which indicated that consumers who hold on to a reliable older device were more satisfied than those who shelled out for the next big thing.

What do you think? Is the allure of the foldable display really worth $1800? What other features would the device need to offer in order to tempt you?

Source: Korea Times

 The best gaming monitors at a glance

  Best gaming monitor up to $400 Best gaming monitor up to $600 Best gaming monitor up to $800 Best gaming monitor up to $1,000 Best gaming monitor for consoles
Model
Image LG Ultragear 27GP850P - product image Asus ROG Strix XG27AQ - product image BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U - product image Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM - product image Gigabyte M32U - product image
Offers
Go to comment (3)
Nicholas Montegriffo

Nicholas Montegriffo
Editor

A cyberpunk and actual punk, Nicholas is the Androidpit team's hardcore gamer, writing with a focus on future tech, VR/AR, AI & robotics. Out of office, he can be found hanging around in goth clubs, eating too many chillies, or at home telling an unlucky nerd that their 8th level wizard died from a poisoned spike trap.

Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
3 comments
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Albin Foro 30
    Albin Foro Jun 16, 2018 Link to comment

    The article tends to moosh the questions of price and technological merit. I'm with others who don't need a flagship phone, much less a Dior red carpet phone, though I've offered my view that as attention-grabbing "bling" fancy phones are a relative bargain, and a perfectly legimate accessory to meet social expectations, announce social ambitions, or build psychological self-esteem.

    The bendy tech, if it's robust and has a good specs for display and performance, seems to have appeal for those who now and then find themselve forcing it into a pants pocket or tight bag and probably would absorb drop impacts better than rigid glass or dentable metal phones. Past the "early adopter" phase, it might not cost so much.


  • 46
    Deactivated Account Jun 16, 2018 Link to comment

    I have my phone and a tablet I really have not use for a 2 in one. It will be to bulky to fit in a packet and to small to replace my tablet. $1800 buck is a serious no thanks for me. I agree with Rusty H. anything over 500 bucks is just to pricy these days with all the wonderful mid market phones out there. Also last years flagship is usually very affordable option at about half the price.

    tom eng


  • Rusty H. 33
    Rusty H. Jun 16, 2018 Link to comment

    Anything over $500.00, in my opinion, for "a phone" is too expensive. But, if people want to pay that to be trendy, no skin off my teeth.

    Deactivated Account

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing